<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explain to me&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pazynicl.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/explain-to-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pazynicl.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/explain-to-me/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pazynicl.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/explain-to-me/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazynicl.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Who cares if he has a Ph.D.  What does that mean.  If you don&#039;t agree you don&#039;t agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares if he has a Ph.D.  What does that mean.  If you don&#8217;t agree you don&#8217;t agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://pazynicl.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/explain-to-me/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pazynicl.wordpress.com/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>That video was sweet. It had a really interesting message and was well done. 

It&#039;s interesting we even discuss the &#039;hive&#039; mind. Is the first time in history we see the voices of the masses &#039;collected&#039; for refinement? This seems like a rather novel experiment, or, at the very least, with new variables. 

Lanier is right on many things, but some philosophies he supports seem misguided. Granted, he has a PhD and I do not. He seems to have disgust with the &#039;Hive&#039; mind. Is he saying the &#039;Hive&#039; is incurable and will always suffer being mentally defficient?  That human society, the members of the &#039;Hive&#039;, will always be, in mass, mentally handicapped? I don&#039;t believe that exists in all possible human societies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That video was sweet. It had a really interesting message and was well done. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting we even discuss the &#8216;hive&#8217; mind. Is the first time in history we see the voices of the masses &#8216;collected&#8217; for refinement? This seems like a rather novel experiment, or, at the very least, with new variables. </p>
<p>Lanier is right on many things, but some philosophies he supports seem misguided. Granted, he has a PhD and I do not. He seems to have disgust with the &#8216;Hive&#8217; mind. Is he saying the &#8216;Hive&#8217; is incurable and will always suffer being mentally defficient?  That human society, the members of the &#8216;Hive&#8217;, will always be, in mass, mentally handicapped? I don&#8217;t believe that exists in all possible human societies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
